← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MCREYNOLDS RESERVOIR

Structure dossier · WDID 1203815 · 3 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1903-08-26332nd most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MASON RESERVOIR (1903-08-26). Immediately behind: HORTON CREEK EXTENSION (1903-09-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19595.01903-08-261916-02-14 2049.58270.0 AMUNINDFIRDOMALL R5

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 43 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 141 AF — 328% of that, and 9th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2015 156 11th lowest of 11 · 363% of median 96 5.8
2016 6 4th lowest of 11 · 14% of median 122 1.9
2017 1 1st lowest of 11 · 2% of median 31 0.2
2018 11 5th lowest of 11 · 26% of median 35 1.7
2019 1 1st lowest of 11 · 2% of median 3 0.2
2020 43 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 138 35 2.8
2021 154 10th lowest of 11 · 358% of median 10 25 14.6
2022 4 3rd lowest of 11 · 9% of median 215 0.1
2023 112 8th lowest of 11 · 260% of median 32 365 6.9
2024 85 7th lowest of 11 · 198% of median 298 365 7.0
2025 141 9th lowest of 11 · 328% of median 112 304 13.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.