Hydrohistorian
Log in

← My Water  ·  All reservoirs in this district  ·  Print / save as PDF  · 

 ·  every download of this record carries its certificate id

CRIPPLE CREEK RES NO 3

Structure dossier · WDID 1203908 · RESERVOIR · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record · probably VICTOR CITY OF’s (matched on DWR’s contact or an EPA intake name; verify below)

Cripple Creek Res No 3 is a reservoir on Beaver Creek in Colorado. This page is its public record: the water it has a right to, whether it may take it today, and its history, compiled from the Colorado Division of Water Resources.

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR structure ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR diversion records ↗ Source Our computation, scored against a reference · scored against DWR's call analysis, see /methods

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-10-15 10:42 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260928 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (dd58e60) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Who owns it

DWR’s own records name no owner for a ditch, reservoir or well, so this comes from the source shown and can be out of date. Organisations only: a private landowner’s name is never listed.

The record and the river

In short

CRIPPLE CREEK RES NO 3 holds 9 decreed rights on BEAVER CREEK. No active call senior to its rights reaches its district today (20 active calls checked), so it is in priority now. 13 further calls state no district and sit outside this one, so they are counted here rather than assumed either way. That is today's position; the weeks ahead cannot be projected for it: only 0 analog year(s) have both flow and a complete administration record; 4 needed. In a median year over its last 4 recorded years it diverts 77 acre-feet. It was a party to 2 court cases that also touched 12 other structures.

Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (10 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.

Download this structure

Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.

⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF

Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv

What is in the bundle
  • rights.csv — every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.
  • annual_use.csv — recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.
  • curtailment_now.csv — each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.
  • court_cases.csv — the cases attached to its rights.
  • co_parties.csv — the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.
  • call_climatology.csv — how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.
  • README.txt — provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (storage). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Dam safety

Dam CRIPPLE CREEK #3 (completed 1891)
Hazard class Significant
Condition at last inspection Conditionally Satisfactory (2025-07-09)
Storage restriction None on file
Normal storage 130 AF
Physical status Active
Emergency action plan Yes

Source: DWR Dam Safety’s jurisdictional-dam inventory (damsafety/damsafetydaminfojd), refreshed weekly. Joined on this structure’s own WDID as DWR records it on the dam. Hazard class describes the consequence of failure, not the likelihood of it. DWR’s dam record.

Current administration

● In priority — no active call senior to this structure's rights affects its district (20 active call(s) checked).

13 further calls state no district and sit outside this one, so they are counted here rather than assumed either way.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

The outlook for the weeks ahead is not computable for this structure: only 0 analog year(s) have both flow and a complete administration record; 4 needed. Today’s position is a separate question, and it is answered in Current administration above — that screen reads the district’s active calls and needs no reference gage.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-03-30 — 5th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CRIPPLE CREEK RES NO 2 (1861-03-30). Immediately behind: CANON HEIGHTS DITCH (1861-04-01).

On BEAVER CREEK at river mile 56.9, it is 6th of 172 down the reach. Immediately upstream: MCREYNOLDS RESERVOIR. Immediately downstream: CRIPPLE CREEK RES NO 1.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (9)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. Alt-pointAn absolute amount decreed at another structure that may be diverted here instead -- an alternate point of diversion or an exchange. DWR calls this the APEX amount; a right showing 0.0 absolute but an alt-point amount is exercised here under another structure's decree. Decreed forWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4107.00000 1861-03-301894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 1.0 cfs Municipal 2
4128.00000 1861-04-201894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 1.6 cfs Municipal 5
4158.00000 1861-05-201894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 0.0567 cfs Municipal 7
5254.00000 1864-05-201894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 0.5 cfs Municipal 19
5570.00000 1865-04-011894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 3.79 cfs Municipal, Industrial +1 24
7780.00000 1871-04-201894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 0.5674 cfs Municipal 67
9236.00000 1875-04-151894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 0.0284 cfs Municipal 151
12474.00000 1884-02-251894-02-03 0.0 cfs 0.0 0.6809 cfs Municipal 298
15304.00000 1891-11-251916-02-14 121.67 AF 0.0 — Municipal NI25.75

Amounts marked cfs are flow rates; AF are stored volumes (storage rights are decreed in acre-feet). An absolute amount of 0.0 beside an alt-point amount is not a dead right: the water is decreed at another structure, and that row records permission to divert it here instead (an alternate point or exchange). A case listing several numbers reflects the original decree plus later change cases.

Recorded use (last 4 years on record)

Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 77 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2015, came in at 340 AF — 442% of that, and 4th lowest of the 4 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 0 1st lowest of 4 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2012 18 2nd lowest of 4 · 23% of median 214 0.1
2013 136 3rd lowest of 4 · 177% of median 214 0.4
2015 340 4th lowest of 4 · 442% of median 214 3.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 9 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record stale 643 measured days, but newest is 3984 day(s) before the data's end (target 450)
record continuity continuous 75% of the irrigation seasons in 2011-2015 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.

Hydrohistorian is free, with no ads — one server and a lot of public records. If it earns its keep, you can help keep it running.