← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

W ANDREWS DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 1300730 · 1 · HARDNACK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1880-06-25330th most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: J HEIN DITCH NO 5 (1880-06-20). Immediately behind: DITCH NO 76 (1880-06-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
11134.01880-06-251896-03-12 0.40.0 CIRR 273

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 13 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 18 AF — 138% of that, and 9th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1952 35 13th lowest of 14 · 269% of median 88 0.2
1975 24 12th lowest of 14 · 185% of median 31 0.4
1980 21 10th lowest of 14 · 162% of median 27 0.4
1985 9 7th lowest of 14 · 69% of median 44 0.1
1986 52 14th lowest of 14 · 400% of median 66 0.4
1988 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1991 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1997 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2007 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2012 23 11th lowest of 14 · 177% of median 61 0.3
2017 1 6th lowest of 14 · 8% of median 2 0.4
2019 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 17 8th lowest of 14 · 131% of median 23 0.4
2024 18 9th lowest of 14 · 138% of median 20 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 368 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 2% of the irrigation seasons in 1952-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.