← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

W ANDREWS DITCH NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 1300732 · 1 · HARDNACK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1886-07-01422nd most senior of the 1017 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HILLSIDE DITCH (1886-06-20). Immediately behind: J SCHMIDT & F DEICKMAN (1886-07-15).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
13331.01886-07-011896-03-12 0.260.0 CIRR 412
14426.01889-06-301896-03-12 0.930.0 CIRR 479

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 29 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 68 AF — 234% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1991 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1992 54 13th lowest of 15 · 186% of median 45 0.6
1997 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2007 20 6th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 28 0.4
2008 47 11th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 73 0.6
2009 32 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 62 0.5
2010 17 5th lowest of 15 · 59% of median 35 0.5
2011 36 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 65 0.4
2013 13 4th lowest of 15 · 45% of median 35 0.2
2015 21 7th lowest of 15 · 72% of median 14 1.0
2019 99 15th lowest of 15 · 341% of median 150 0.4
2021 29 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 31 0.5
2022 52 12th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 104 0.3
2023 7 3rd lowest of 15 · 24% of median 14 0.3
2024 68 14th lowest of 15 · 234% of median 127 0.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.