← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HIGGASON SPRINGS
Structure dossier · WDID 1500614 · 7 · SAINT CHARLES RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1859-05-01 — 10th most senior of the 704 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COLD SPRING COLL GALLERY (1859-05-01). Immediately behind: GRANEROS CREEK FEEDER (1859-05-01).
Decreed rights (12)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3408.0 | 1859-05-01 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 3 |
| 4748.0 | 1862-12-31 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 8 |
| 5599.0 | 1865-04-30 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 15 |
| 5965.0 | 1866-05-01 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 23 |
| 6666.0 | 1868-04-01 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 38 |
| 7761.0 | 1871-04-01 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 57 |
| 7792.0 | 1871-05-02 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 60 |
| 8553.0 | 1873-06-01 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 88 |
| 9496.0 | 1875-12-31 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 99 |
| 9862.0 | 1876-12-31 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 106 |
| 11688.0 | 1881-12-31 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 139 |
| 13514.0 | 1886-12-31 | 1893-06-26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | 169, 173.5 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 36 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1984, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1959 | 60 | 11th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 365 | 0.1 |
| 1960 | 60 | 11th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 305 | 0.1 |
| 1961 | 20 | 5th lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 103 | 0.1 |
| 1962 | 40 | 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 202 | 0.1 |
| 1963 | 4 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 11% of median | 19 | 0.1 |
| 1969 | 24 | 6th lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 61 | 0.2 |
| 1970 | 145 | 14th lowest of 15 · 403% of median | 365 | 0.2 |
| 1971 | 121 | 13th lowest of 15 · 336% of median | 304 | 0.2 |
| 1972 | 24 | 6th lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 61 | 0.2 |
| 1973 | 168 | 15th lowest of 15 · 467% of median | 298 | 0.5 |
| 1975 | 49 | 10th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | 124 | 0.2 |
| 1977 | 13 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 35 | 0.2 |
| 1978 | 36 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 140 | 0.2 |
| 1979 | 13 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 66 | 0.1 |
| 1984 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.