Saint Charles
Bootstrap review report — d2_wd15_saint_charles
Generated 2026-08-13 22:22 UTC for Division 2 / Water District 15.
This is a review checklist, not a finished config. Everything below is a suggestion from live DWR data — confirm or correct each section in config.yaml before running this basin for real.
1. Stream-name patterns
Assumed mainstem pattern: SAINT CHARLES RIVER (highest-count waterSource value). Candidates below by structure count — decide which are real tributaries worth their own centerline vs. noise, and add them to longitudinal.tributary_stream_patterns in priority order (more-specific names, e.g. "WEST FORK X", must precede substrings of themselves, e.g. "X").
| waterSource | structure count |
|---|---|
| SAINT CHARLES RIVER (assumed mainstem) | 57 |
| GREENHORN CREEK | 27 |
| GRANEROS CREEK | 9 |
| NORTH MUDDY CREEK | 5 |
| SOUTH MUDDY CREEK | 5 |
| MIDDLE CREEK | 4 |
| WILLIS CREEK | 4 |
| NORTH CREEK | 3 |
2. Diversion / return classification
Auto-classified from structureType + name patterns: 101 diversions, 13 returns, 156 unclassified (neither pattern matched — these render as neither on the schematic unless added to return_flow_wdids/force_diversion_wdids or a type is added to the diversion/return type lists).
This layer needs the least manual work — it's the same heuristic the engine uses at runtime. Spot-check a sample rather than reviewing every row; if you have a water-year accounting spreadsheet for this basin, cross-reference it against the 'other' bucket specifically (that's where a real augmentation return with an unusual DWR structureType will hide).
2b. Cross-checked against decreed water rights (CDSS)
38 structure(s) have a decreed water right (CDSS waterrights/netamount) that disagrees with the structureType/name-pattern classification above. Same-agency evidence (DWR/HydroBase), not independent of DWR the way the NLDI topology check is — worth a glance, not an automatic correction.
| wdid | structure | currently | decreed uses suggest | decreed uses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1500643 | K T DUNN HEADGATE | other | diversion | Power Generation |
| 1505003 | F B ROOKE & SONS WELL 2 | other | diversion | Domestic, Fishery, Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505008 | BEULAH RANGER STA WELL | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation |
| 1505009 | BOZELL WELL | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic |
| 1505011 | CF&I WELL NO 2 | other | diversion | Industrial |
| 1505012 | CF&I WELL NO 3 | other | diversion | Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505013 | CF&I WELL NO 4 | other | diversion | Domestic, Industrial |
| 1505014 | CLENNIN IRRIGATION WELL | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505015 | COWDEN WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic |
| 1505017 | COWDEN WELL NO 3 | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505019 | COWDEN WELL NO 7 | other | diversion | Commercial |
| 1505022 | DECKER WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505026 | DIXIT WELL NO 4 | other | diversion | All Beneficial Uses, Irrigation, Municipal |
| 1505027 | DONLEY WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505028 | DUELL WELL NO 13759-F | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation, Municipal |
| 1505031 | FASS WELL | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505032 | FETROW ARTESIAN WELL | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation |
| 1505033 | GREAT WESTERN WELL | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505041 | KIRKLAND WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Stock |
| 1505042 | KIRKLAND WELL NO 2 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Stock |
| 1505043 | KIRKLAND WELL NO 3 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Stock |
| 1505044 | KIRKLAND WELL NO 4 | other | diversion | Commercial, Domestic, Stock |
| 1505047 | MAFFET WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Domestic, Fishery, Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505049 | OGDEN WELL | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505050 | PIGG WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505051 | PIGG WELL NO 2 | other | diversion | Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505052 | PUEBLO WELL NO 5 | other | diversion | Municipal |
| 1505053 | PUEBLO WELL NO 6 | other | diversion | Municipal |
| 1505055 | RECREATION DISTRICT WELL | other | diversion | Irrigation, Municipal, Recreation |
| 1505057 | SELLERS WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation, Municipal |
| 1505059 | STEWART WELL NO 2 | other | diversion | Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505060 | STURTEVANT WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505061 | TOWN OF RYE WELL | other | diversion | Municipal |
| 1505064 | VIDMAR IRRIGATION WELL | other | diversion | Irrigation |
| 1505065 | WHITE SUMP NO 1 | other | diversion | Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505066 | WHITE SUMP NO 2 | other | diversion | Irrigation, Stock |
| 1505068 | YOUNGREN DAKOTA WELL | other | diversion | Domestic, Municipal |
| 1505069 | WYATT WELL NO 1 | other | diversion | Domestic, Irrigation, Stock |
3. Suspected nested tributaries
Still need a human decision — these tributary pairs are comparably close to EACH OTHER as to the mainstem — one may actually join the other rather than the mainstem directly (like Leavenworth Creek -> South Clear Creek in the Clear Creek basin). NLDI couldn't resolve these (no nearby flowline, or ambiguous/no downstream overlap within range) — if you know the real topology, set it in longitudinal.tributary_parent_overrides.
| tributary | possible parent | dist to possible parent (mi) | dist to mainstem (mi) | NLDI result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORTH CREEK | MIDDLE CREEK | 2.69 | 5.43 | NLDI check failed: 429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for url: https://api.water.usgs.gov/nldi/linked-data/comid/position?f=json&coords=POINT%28-105.044386+38.114821%29 |
| NORTH MUDDY CREEK | SOUTH MUDDY CREEK | 0.9 | 1.51 | NLDI check failed: 429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for url: https://api.water.usgs.gov/nldi/linked-data/comid/position?f=json&coords=POINT%28-104.967683+37.953864%29 |
| GRANEROS CREEK | GREENHORN CREEK | 1.47 | 2.63 | NLDI check failed: 429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for url: https://api.water.usgs.gov/nldi/linked-data/comid/position?f=json&coords=POINT%28-104.848914+37.910266%29 |
| SOUTH MUDDY CREEK | NORTH MUDDY CREEK | 0.87 | 1.32 | NLDI check failed: 429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for url: https://api.water.usgs.gov/nldi/linked-data/comid/position?f=json&coords=POINT%28-104.970716+37.941085%29 |
4. Gage placement risk
None — every gage with a resolvable position is within the placement cutoff.
12 more gage(s) pass but are within 2x the cutoff distance — worth a glance if the structure dataset changes later.
Next steps
- Fill in
tributary_stream_patternsfrom section 1. - Resolve section 3's flags (or confirm none apply).
- Resolve section 4's at-risk gages.
- Cross-reference
return_flow_wdids/force_diversion_wdidsagainst any local accounting source you have for this basin. - Review the rendered schematic for this district before relying on it.
Evolution of the network
Computed 2026-08-20 08:37 from 12 gage(s) with cached period-of-record data. Statistical tests (Mann-Kendall trend, Pettitt changepoint) require at least 8 years spanning at least 10 years of record -- gages below that report no signal, not "no change."
Data provenance & quality
Where these numbers come from and how far they can be trusted. Grade C (3/6 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (imported 2026-08-19) for history, plus the CDSS REST API for current conditions.
| Check | State | What was measured |
|---|---|---|
| gage freshness | stale | newest gage reading is 45 day(s) old (target 7) |
| diversion record | expected-lag | newest diversion record is 293 day(s) old (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears) |
| structure coverage | sparse | 3% of schematic structures have data |
Independent check: PASS — 100.0000% agreement across 212,966 stored values re-checked against DWR's authoritative record (HydroBase_CO_20260707), over 20 structures. 0 disagreement(s) beyond a 0.01 cfs tolerance. Checked 2026-08-19; a rotating sample covers the whole basin across successive runs, and the structures this report cites are checked every time.
Federal cross-check: PASS — 99.95% day-level agreement with USGS's own published records for the same gages, across 8 co-listed station(s) and 36,555 overlapping days (within max(2%, 0.5 cfs) daily). Pre-1950 records at some gages carry known between-agency day-stamp and transcription differences — scored at each year's best ±1-day alignment; residual disagreement is real historical divergence, flagged for review.
12 gage(s) / 57,881 daily values (1923-03-01–2026-07-06); 182 structure(s) with diversion records; 704 with decreed rights. Methodology has not yet had independent expert review — treat every figure as an advisory screen, not an administrative or legal conclusion.
Read this first: the measurement network itself evolved
This basin was not always measured the way it is today — the API-era record is dense and recent, the early record sparse. 4 gage(s) and 65 structure(s) report in 2026, but structure reporting only reached half its modern level around ~1912. Every historical claim below is checked against this: long-term shifts that co-move with the growth of the network carry an explicit measurement-evolution caution, and abandonment screens whose idleness begins before the modern reporting era are flagged †.
| Decade | Gages with data (median yr) | Structures reporting (median yr) |
|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 12 |
| 1910s | 0 | 53 |
| 1920s | 1 | 58 |
| 1930s | 1 | 72 |
| 1940s | 1 | 65 |
| 1950s | 0 | 55 |
| 1960s | 0 | 49 |
| 1970s | 2 | 78 |
| 1980s | 1 | 73 |
| 1990s | 1 | 58 |
| 2000s | 2 | 71 |
| 2010s | 4 | 69 |
| 2020s | 4 | 65 |
Gage flow trend & changepoints
Every located gage with a period of record — dot size scales with the strength of its flow trend (|Sen slope| in %/decade, the same statistic as the table below), color with direction. An amber ring marks a detected Pettitt changepoint. Click a gage to chart its trend and shift.
| Gage | Trend | Change / decade | Significance | Years | Changepoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
▸
ST. CHARLES RIVER AT BURNT MILL, CO. STCBURCO |
↓ decreasing | -244.7% | p=0.016 | 12 | — |
11 other gage(s) show no significant trend or changepoint (not shown).
Mass-balance (network closure) trend
Structure divrec-history backfill coverage as of the last check: 3% of 824 schematic-relevant structures. 0 year(s) clear the 30% coverage gate so far -- the trend activates automatically once qualifying years span a full decade. No action needed; the nightly backfill keeps extending the record.
Reach gain/loss shifts (1974–2025)
Mass-balance kinks computed for every summer month back to 1974 (135 reach-snapshots) — which reaches gain or lose water, and how that has shifted across decades. Each shift is cross-checked against the observation record above: as more diversions became metered, "unaccounted" water shrinks mechanically, which can masquerade as a hydrologic shift.
No reach shows a statistically significant long-term gain/loss shift.
Groundwater now has its own tab: 80 monitored well(s), water-table trends, stream corridors, and the advisory depletion screen.
Reservoirs now has its own tab: 9 reservoir(s), end-of-year storage back to 1950, click-to-chart histories.
Cross-gage pattern fingerprint
Over the 12-year window with full coverage (2015–2026), the dominant shared pattern across 3 gage(s) explains 46% of year-to-year variance (almost certainly a basin-wide climate/snowpack driver).
COMRETCO doesn't move with that shared pattern -- a real, localized signal (a new diversion, land-use change, or a gage-specific data problem) worth a closer look, not necessarily noise.
The basin's aquifer story, from 343 water-level measurements across 80 monitored well(s) (18 alluvial, 0 bedrock, rest unclassified) — plus 5 administered well(s) reporting metered pumping through diversion records. Observation wells and pumping wells are different populations and are never conflated. Click a well to chart its record.
Well map
Every monitored well with a location — hover for identity, click to chart its water-level record below. ● alluvial ● bedrock / confined (Denver Basin, High Plains, etc. — one-way, no human-timescale recharge) ● unclassified — marker size scales with the strength of the well's water-level trend (|Sen slope| in ft/decade — the same Mann-Kendall/Sen statistic as the trends table below); the smallest, faintest dots have too little record to test.
3D aquifer x-ray
Every aquifer unit as its own 3D head surface — alluvial water table on top, Denver Basin members (Dawson, Denver, Arapahoe, Laramie–Fox Hills) stacked beneath where measured — interpolated from measured water levels and animated through time. Units are never mixed; surfaces exist only inside each unit's well coverage (no extrapolation); thin epochs are suppressed with their reason shown. Vertical scale exaggerated for readability; z is head elevation in feet. Advisory — measured heads, not a calibrated model.
Water-table trends
Of 1 well(s) with enough record for a trend test: 1 declining, 0 rising.
| Fastest-declining wells | Setting | ft / decade | Span | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ SC02106523ADC | alluvial | -2.65 | 44 yr | 0.0003 |
Wells labeled by administrative world before anything else is said about them: tributary alluvium participates in the priority system; designated-basin and Denver Basin bedrock aquifers are governed differently and are excluded from stream-connection reasoning. Read bedrock declines differently too: deep bedrock aquifers recharge negligibly on human timescales, so a falling bedrock level is storage mining — effectively permanent — not a drought response that a wet year undoes. All screens advisory.
9 reservoir(s) with 2,308 storage measurement(s), 1950–2014. Basin storage as of 2013-10-31 (the record's own end — reservoir records publish ~annually): 893 AF across 1 reservoir(s). Storage change is real water the mass balance must credit — a losing reach beside a filling reservoir isn't losing water, it's banking it.
Reservoir map — how full is each vessel?
Each reservoir drawn as a vessel: bubble size ∝ its record-high storage, fill level = last recorded storage as a share of its surveyed capacity (USACE National Inventory of Dams) where a confident NID match exists — the tooltip names the matched dam — and of its own record high otherwise (a wrong capacity would be worse than an honest record high, so only confident joins upgrade). Hover for numbers, click to chart its history below the map. A dashed teal ring marks reservoirs reporting live DWR telemetry — their fill reflects yesterday's storage, drawn as a dotted tail on charts and treated as provisional until the next verified HydroBase snapshot supersedes it. ● <25% ● 25–60% ● 60–90% ● >90%
Basin storage, end of each water year
End-of-water-year totals; per-year reservoir counts shown because reporting coverage varies -- a total is only comparable to years with similar counts.
Largest reservoirs on record
Click a reservoir to chart its full storage history.
| Reservoir | Last recorded storage (AF) | As of |
|---|---|---|
| ▸ ST CHARLES RES NO 3 (1503829) | 6,033 | 2000-10-30 |
| ▸ ST CHARLES RES NO 2 (1503828) | 2,047 | 2000-10-30 |
| ▸ LAKE ISABEL (1503830) | 1,069 | 1952-11-01 |
| ▸ HAYDEN RESERVOIR (1503695) | 893 | 2013-10-31 |
| ▸ BONNIEMEADE RESERVOIR (1503694) | 200 | 1997-05-20 |
| ▸ CLARK RESERVOIR NO 1 (7903728) | 100 | 1994-10-15 |
| ▸ HICKLAND RESERVOIR NO 2 (1503696) | 5 | 1997-07-01 |
| ▸ NAUMANN POND (1503512) | 0 | 2009-10-31 |
Decrees, seniority, and administrative calls connected to this basin's flow network. Advisory reading aids on public DWR data — not administrative or legal conclusions. Rights on file: 957 across 704 structure(s); 29 structure(s) carry 0 court-case references.
Abandonment radar (25 screens)
Absolute rights with 10+ years of no recorded diversions. Screens only — storage, alternate points, and plan operations can explain nonuse lawfully. And diversion REPORTING itself only reached its modern level ~1912 — idleness that begins before then may be unreported use, not nonuse (flagged † below).
- GREENHORN HIGHLINE DITCH (1500539) (1859-05-01, 10.9 cfs decreed): last active 1934 — 91 years idle
- FISHER CANON DITCH NO 2 (1500560) (1893-06-27, 2.0 cfs decreed): last active 1939 — 86 years idle
- MEXICAN DITCH (1500585) (1867-02-20, 2.0 cfs decreed): last active 1957 — 68 years idle
- MCDANIEL DITCH NO 3 (1500569) (1879-11-30, 0.1 cfs decreed): last active 1973 — 52 years idle
- MOORE'S SPRING PIPELINE (1500617) (1906-06-30, 0.5 cfs decreed): last active 1973 — 52 years idle
- DAVIS DITCH (1500533) (1873-06-01, 0.9 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- COLORADO CITY WELL NO 3 (1505593) (1965-08-25, 0.6 cfs decreed): last active 1974 — 51 years idle
- CRAWFORD & SMYTHE DITCH (1500531) (1870-03-01, 3.7 cfs decreed): last active 1975 — 50 years idle
- PIERSON SPRING DITCH (1500619) (1868-05-01, 1.8 cfs decreed): last active 1975 — 50 years idle
- IRON SPRINGS PIPELINE (1500642) (1901-12-31, 0.3 cfs decreed): last active 1982 — 43 years idle
Compliance screens (58 advisory flags)
Screened 105 of 704 structures with rights (117 have diversion history on file). A flag is a lead for expert review — augmentation plans, exchanges, and free-river conditions can make over-decree diversions lawful and are deliberately not modeled.
- DOTSON DITCH NO 1 (1500507): Observed p99 daily rate 26.2 cfs (max 266.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 26.0 cfs across 47152 recorded day(s).
- A J LAMB DITCH (1500567): Observed p99 daily rate 11.2 cfs (max 15.5) exceeds total decreed absolute 7.3 cfs across 7705 recorded day(s).
- GREENHORN HIGHLINE DITCH (1500539): Observed p99 daily rate 11.0 cfs (max 11.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 10.9 cfs across 2376 recorded day(s).
- HICKLIN DITCH "A" (1500538): Observed p99 daily rate 10.0 cfs (max 29.4) exceeds total decreed absolute 0.7 cfs across 38112 recorded day(s).
- HICKLIN DITCH "B" (1500540): Observed p99 daily rate 10.0 cfs (max 20.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 1.7 cfs across 2732 recorded day(s).
- CRAWFORD & SMYTHE DITCH (1500531): Observed p99 daily rate 6.0 cfs (max 8.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 3.7 cfs across 9180 recorded day(s).
- STANLEY DITCH NO 1 (1500554): Observed p99 daily rate 5.8 cfs (max 38.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 1.5 cfs across 5902 recorded day(s).
- WAGNER DITCH (1500524): Observed p99 daily rate 4.2 cfs (max 8.0) exceeds total decreed absolute 1.5 cfs across 10596 recorded day(s).
- MARINCICH PUMP (1500525): Observed p99 daily rate 4.2 cfs (max 4.6) exceeds total decreed absolute 0.8 cfs across 1454 recorded day(s).
- CHASE DITCH (1500506): Observed p99 daily rate 4.0 cfs (max 11.5) exceeds total decreed absolute 2.0 cfs across 7370 recorded day(s).
Seniority (top structures by decreed rate)
| Structure | Senior priority date | Rights | Decreed abs (cfs) | Decreed abs (AF) | Conditional? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST CHARLES FLOOD DITCH (1500522) | 1861-09-01 | 16 | 1135.4 | 0 | — |
| HAYDEN SUPPLY DITCH (1500537) | 1859-05-01 | 11 | 70.0 | 0 | — |
| DOTSON DITCH NO 1 (1500507) | 1865-05-31 | 4 | 26.0 | 0 | — |
| BRYSON DITCH (1500504) | 1883-10-31 | 3 | 11.6 | 0 | — |
| GREENHORN HIGHLINE DITCH (1500539) | 1859-05-01 | 16 | 10.9 | 0 | — |
| A J LAMB DITCH (1500567) | 1869-12-31 | 7 | 7.3 | 0 | — |
| POLLARD DITCH (1500518) | 1866-12-15 | 2 | 6.0 | 0 | — |
| HIGHLINE DITCH (1500541) | 1869-03-01 | 4 | 5.4 | 0 | — |
| PIONEER MIDDLE CREEK (1500517) | 1866-06-30 | 4 | 5.1 | 0 | — |
| MIDDLE CREEK MIN FLOW - LOWER (1503008) | 2010-01-26 | 1 | 5.1 | 0 | — |
| RYE FISH HATCHERY P/L #2 (1500550) | 1939-09-15 | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | — |
| SHURTZ DITCH (1500553) | 1868-04-01 | 6 | 4.9 | 0 | — |
| GREENHORN CREEK MIN FLOW (1503003) | 1998-05-11 | 1 | 4.8 | 0 | — |
| BRYSON PUMP NO 1 (1500757) | 1870-01-02 | 2 | 4.5 | 0 | — |
| GREENHORN VALLEY DITCH (1500536) | 1859-05-01 | 14 | 4.2 | 0 | — |
No inventory or legal-document changes detected since the daily watch began.
If a call were placed at a given seniority, which structures in this basin would be out of priority, and how much of their decreed rate would be curtailed? Computed from this basin's cached decrees.
What this does and doesn't model. Seniority arithmetic only: every right junior to the call is treated as curtailed. It does not model reach applicability — structures downstream of the calling point are not administered by it — and it applies no futile-call judgment. Read it as “who is junior to this date, and by how much,” not as a prediction of what the Division Engineer would actually order.
Pick a calling right
Real decrees from this basin, ordered by administration number — that is, by actual seniority. The years will look out of order, and that is correct: an administration number encodes the adjudication date as well as the appropriation date, so a right appropriated in 1970 can be administered ahead of one from 1950. A senior call curtails almost everything; a junior one curtails almost nothing.
Or enter an administration number directly
DWR administration numbers encode appropriation and adjudication dates; lower is more senior.
Each row shows a streamgage where the upstream walk (headwater seed ± diversions ± returns ± tributaries) disagrees with the gage reading. Possible reasons include ungaged diversions/returns, channel losses, or structures with stale telemetry.
| Stream | Gage | R-mile | Predicted (cfs) | Observed (cfs) | Δ (cfs) | Reach (mi) | Hypothesis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAINSTEM | SAINT CHARLES RIVER AT VINELAND (STCHARCO) | 61.4 | 5.3 | 56.6 | +51.2 | 10.1 | Unaccounted +51.2 cfs gain over 10.1 mi. No structure clearly responsible — possible ungaged return flow, baseflow from groundwater, or unmodeled tributary inflow. |
| MAINSTEM | COMANCHE RETURN FLOW (COMRETCO) | 51.3 | 0.3 | 5.3 | +5.0 | 37.4 | Unaccounted +5.0 cfs gain over 37.4 mi. No structure clearly responsible — possible ungaged return flow, baseflow from groundwater, or unmodeled tributary inflow. |
Ribbon width ∝ flow. Hover any diversion/return branch for its data source (live telemetry vs. annual divrec) and age — use that to judge how much to trust a given number.
| Gage ⇅ | Station ⇅ | Avg cfs Aug 10–Aug 16 ⇅ |
% Hist Median ⇅ | Rank ⇅ | Δ1wk ⇅ | Δ4wk ⇅ | Yrs ⇅ | Status ⇅ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRECRKCO | GREENHORN CREEK ABOVE RYE CO | 0.3 | 10% | 0 | +0 | +0 | 19.1 | SHORT_RECORD |
| SHRDITCO | SHURTZ DITCH ABOVE RYE CO | 0.0 | 0% | 0 | +0 | +0 | 19.2 | SHORT_RECORD |
| COMRETCO | COMANCHE RETURN FLOW | 2.3 | 77% | 0 | -0 | -0 | 18.1 | SHORT_RECORD |
| STCHARCO | SAINT CHARLES RIVER AT VINELAND | 56.6 | 240% | 77 | +48 | +54 | 47.8 | OK |
Call details in gantt above
3 alert(s) · 0 warning(s) · 3 info. Each gage contributes at most one flag per category (its single most-severe match), so this list shouldn't multiply-count the same underlying condition.