← My Water · Print / save as PDF
FRANCISCO DAIGRE (GRAN)
Structure dossier · WDID 1600630 · 1 · CUCHARAS RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1863-05-30 — 4th most senior of the 1044 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRANCISCO DAIGRE MILL (1863-05-30). Immediately behind: WALSENBURG PIPELINE (1863-05-30).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4898.0 | 1863-05-30 | 1889-06-12 | 0.078 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 1 |
| 5295.0 | 1864-06-30 | 1889-06-12 | 1.092 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 3 |
| 7791.0 | 1871-05-01 | 1889-06-12 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 17 |
| 53190.0 | 1995-08-18 | 1996-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRREVP | |
| 53325.53154 | 1995-07-13 | 1996-12-31 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRRECFISFIRWLD | |
| 53325.5319 | 1995-08-18 | 1996-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRREVP |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 147 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 224 AF — 152% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 156 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | — | 365 | 0.8 |
| 2012 | 202 | 13th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | — | 366 | 1.1 |
| 2013 | 102 | 5th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | — | 364 | 0.8 |
| 2014 | 183 | 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | — | 365 | 2.0 |
| 2015 | 129 | 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | — | 365 | 1.0 |
| 2016 | 179 | 10th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | — | 313 | 0.7 |
| 2017 | 119 | 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | — | 165 | 0.9 |
| 2018 | 20 | 4th lowest of 15 · 14% of median | — | 124 | 0.3 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | — | 52 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 9 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median | — | 82 | 0.2 |
| 2021 | 10 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 7% of median | — | 63 | 0.4 |
| 2022 | 182 | 11th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | — | 211 | 2.9 |
| 2023 | 207 | 14th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | — | 117 | 1.3 |
| 2024 | 147 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 208 | 0.6 |
| 2025 | 224 | 15th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | — | 304 | 0.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.