Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SOUTH ABEYTA HIGHLAND
Structure dossier · WDID 1600870 · 1 · SOUTH ABEYTA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-02-14 — 110th most senior of the 1044 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MARIA STEVENS RESERVOIR (1887-08-08). Immediately behind: HAYES DITCH (1867-05-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13924.0 | 1888-02-14 | 1889-06-12 | 12.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 69 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 79 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 132 | 11th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 72 | 2.4 |
| 2010 | 66 | 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 53 | 2.0 |
| 2011 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 29 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | 234 | 12th lowest of 15 · 296% of median | 74 | 3.3 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 39 | 0.0 |
| 2014 | 79 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 71 | 1.5 |
| 2015 | 282 | 14th lowest of 15 · 357% of median | 61 | 7.5 |
| 2016 | 339 | 15th lowest of 15 · 429% of median | 82 | 4.6 |
| 2017 | 49 | 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 51 | 3.6 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 41 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 49 | 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 52 | 3.6 |
| 2020 | 112 | 9th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | 64 | 2.9 |
| 2021 | 237 | 13th lowest of 15 · 300% of median | 76 | 3.3 |
| 2022 | 125 | 10th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | 59 | 3.1 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.