← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORTH VETA CANON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1600896 · 1 · NORTH ABEYTA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1873-03-0181st most senior of the 1044 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BEAVER DAM DITCH (1872-06-25). Immediately behind: PATTERSON DITCH (1873-04-20).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8461.01873-03-011889-06-12 6.00.0 CIRRAUG 32

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 472 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1993 335 7th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 82 3.0
2001 54 4th lowest of 15 · 11% of median 24 2.5
2010 500 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 82 6.0
2013 120 6th lowest of 15 · 25% of median 61 1.0
2014 1,792 15th lowest of 15 · 380% of median 304 14.0
2015 794 10th lowest of 15 · 168% of median 306 6.8
2016 1,260 12th lowest of 15 · 267% of median 366 13.5
2017 1,279 13th lowest of 15 · 271% of median 365 14.2
2018 25 3rd lowest of 15 · 5% of median 273 0.3
2019 1,138 11th lowest of 15 · 241% of median 304 9.2
2020 54 4th lowest of 15 · 11% of median 306 0.6
2021 1,492 14th lowest of 15 · 316% of median 274 15.9
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2024 472 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 134 1.8
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.