Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

POOLE MEADOW D

Structure dossier · WDID 2000796 · 1 · PINOS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1874-11-01 — 73rd most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: POOLE JEMISON D (1874-11-01). Immediately behind: LEASE,DAVIS AND BINGLE D (1874-12-03).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9071.01874-11-011896-05-01 0.50.0 CIRR 69
9071.01874-11-011896-05-01 1.00.0 CIRR 70
19456.14731890-04-301916-09-13 2.50.0 CIRR 1916-27A

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 102 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 118 AF — 116% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 119 14th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 43 1.5
2012 102 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 41 1.5
2013 13 1st lowest of 15 · 13% of median 8 1.5
2014 119 14th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 43 4.0
2015 90 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 36 4.0
2016 79 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 34 1.5
2017 92 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 36 1.5
2018 35 3rd lowest of 15 · 34% of median 35 1.5
2019 114 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 23 4.0
2020 27 2nd lowest of 15 · 26% of median 14 1.5
2021 35 3rd lowest of 15 · 34% of median 15 1.5
2022 117 12th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 44 1.5
2023 103 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 46 1.5
2024 110 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 43 1.5
2025 118 13th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 54 1.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.