Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

POOLE JEMISON D

Structure dossier · WDID 2000795 · 1 · PINOS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1874-11-01 — 72nd most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MEADOW OVERFLOW (1874-09-20). Immediately behind: POOLE MEADOW D (1874-11-01).

Decreed rights (4)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9071.01874-11-011896-05-01 0.50.0 CIRR 69
9313.01875-07-011896-05-01 0.90.0 CIRR 99
19456.157661893-03-011916-09-13 1.00.0 CIRR 1916-33B
19456.157661893-03-011916-09-13 1.00.0 CIRR 1916-33E

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 97 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 119 AF — 123% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 91 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 43 1.4
2012 90 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 41 1.4
2013 5 1st lowest of 15 · 5% of median 8 0.5
2014 164 14th lowest of 15 · 169% of median 65 3.4
2015 211 15th lowest of 15 · 218% of median 129 1.4
2016 132 10th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 62 1.4
2017 158 13th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 164 1.4
2018 79 5th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 58 1.3
2019 76 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 66 1.6
2020 24 2nd lowest of 15 · 25% of median 42 0.5
2021 152 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 102 1.4
2022 139 11th lowest of 15 · 143% of median 115 1.4
2023 64 3rd lowest of 15 · 66% of median 63 1.0
2024 97 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 58 1.4
2025 119 9th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 71 1.4

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.