Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ROBRAN D
Structure dossier · WDID 2000818 · 1 · PINOS CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1867-03-10 — 7th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MONTOYA 1 2 5 D (1867-03-10). Immediately behind: MONTOYA-MEXICAN D (1867-03-10).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6278.0 | 1867-03-10 | 1896-05-01 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 4 |
| 8552.0 | 1873-05-31 | 1896-05-01 | 3.1 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 21 |
| 8582.0 | 1873-06-30 | 1896-05-01 | 0.7 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 22 |
| 10743.0 | 1879-05-31 | 1896-05-01 | 0.09 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 168 |
| 19456.1471 | 1890-04-10 | 1916-09-13 | 6.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 1916-26C |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,044 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,056 AF — 101% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,017 | 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 207 | 4.6 |
| 2012 | 782 | 1st lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 214 | 4.5 |
| 2013 | 852 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 201 | 4.4 |
| 2014 | 1,396 | 15th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 174 | 11.0 |
| 2015 | 1,015 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 191 | 6.9 |
| 2016 | 1,044 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 190 | 11.0 |
| 2017 | 818 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 183 | 4.5 |
| 2018 | 1,130 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 218 | 4.5 |
| 2019 | 1,133 | 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 187 | 11.0 |
| 2020 | 969 | 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 206 | 4.5 |
| 2021 | 1,213 | 13th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 213 | 4.5 |
| 2022 | 1,361 | 14th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 214 | 4.5 |
| 2023 | 1,170 | 12th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 197 | 4.5 |
| 2024 | 864 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 189 | 4.5 |
| 2025 | 1,056 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 198 | 4.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.