Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HALL-VOSS D
Structure dossier · WDID 2000966 · 1 · RIO GRANDE · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1883-04-01 — 247th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SHERIDAN NORTH D (1883-04-01). Immediately behind: CORSON D 2 1ST PT (1883-04-01).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12144.0 | 1883-04-01 | 1896-05-01 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 244 |
| 12905.0 | 1885-05-01 | 1896-05-01 | 0.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 275 |
| 14336.0 | 1889-04-01 | 1896-05-01 | 0.15 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 350 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 192 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 262 AF — 136% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 166 | 6th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 66 | 2.0 |
| 2012 | 151 | 5th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | 55 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 204 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 80 | 2.0 |
| 2014 | 265 | 13th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | 84 | 2.0 |
| 2015 | 192 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 97 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 139 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 65 | 2.0 |
| 2017 | 264 | 12th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | 90 | 2.0 |
| 2018 | 59 | 1st lowest of 15 · 31% of median | 40 | 2.0 |
| 2019 | 307 | 15th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 99 | 2.0 |
| 2020 | 143 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 63 | 2.0 |
| 2021 | 179 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 67 | 2.0 |
| 2022 | 143 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 57 | 2.0 |
| 2023 | 275 | 14th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 90 | 2.3 |
| 2024 | 205 | 10th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | 77 | 2.0 |
| 2025 | 262 | 11th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | 102 | 2.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.