← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CORSON D 2 1ST PT

Structure dossier · WDID 2001023 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-04-01248th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HALL-VOSS D (1883-04-01). Immediately behind: CORSON D 2 2ND PT (1883-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12144.01883-04-011896-05-01 1.00.0 CIRRFISDOMSTK 243

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 45 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1997, came in at 512 AF — 1138% of that, and 13th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1980 60 9th lowest of 13 · 133% of median 31 1.0
1982 34 3rd lowest of 13 · 76% of median 19 1.0
1983 58 8th lowest of 13 · 129% of median 31 1.0
1984 45 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 46 0.5
1985 60 9th lowest of 13 · 133% of median 46 1.0
1989 43 5th lowest of 13 · 96% of median 45 0.5
1990 36 4th lowest of 13 · 80% of median 38 0.5
1991 32 1st lowest of 13 · 71% of median 33 0.5
1992 151 12th lowest of 13 · 336% of median 80 1.0
1993 139 11th lowest of 13 · 309% of median 62 3.0
1994 32 1st lowest of 13 · 71% of median 17 1.0
1996 44 6th lowest of 13 · 98% of median 32 1.0
1997 512 13th lowest of 13 · 1138% of median 214 1.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 694 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 16% of the irrigation seasons in 1980-2000 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.