← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CRITES AUG PLAN RECHARGE PIT

Structure dossier · WDID 2002085 · RA · RIO GRANDE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:37 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1896-05-01413th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ENSZ AUG PLAN RECHARGE PIT (1896-05-01). Immediately behind: BRADLEY RECHARGE PIT (1896-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16923.01896-05-011996-12-31 525.00.0 ARCH

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 309 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2020, came in at 56 AF — 18% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2001 549 12th lowest of 13 · 178% of median 135 3.5
2002 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2003 174 4th lowest of 13 · 56% of median 49 4.1
2004 286 6th lowest of 13 · 93% of median 122 3.1
2005 631 13th lowest of 13 · 204% of median 148 7.9
2006 351 10th lowest of 13 · 114% of median 194 38.0
2014 344 9th lowest of 13 · 111% of median 135 7.2
2015 456 11th lowest of 13 · 148% of median 225 9.2
2016 309 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 225 6.3
2017 330 8th lowest of 13 · 107% of median 224 3.6
2018 18 2nd lowest of 13 · 6% of median 224 0.8
2019 238 5th lowest of 13 · 77% of median 213 4.8
2020 56 3rd lowest of 13 · 18% of median 23 3.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1920 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 47% of the irrigation seasons in 2001-2020 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.