← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BRADLEY RECHARGE PIT

Structure dossier · WDID 2003678 · RA · RIO GRANDE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1896-05-01414th most senior of the 8016 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CRITES AUG PLAN RECHARGE PIT (1896-05-01). Immediately behind: JESSUP D 1 (1874-06-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16923.01896-05-011999-12-31 399.00.0 ARCH

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 301 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 108 AF — 36% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2004 256 5th lowest of 12 · 85% of median 88 3.2
2005 292 6th lowest of 12 · 97% of median 79 3.4
2006 310 7th lowest of 12 · 103% of median 215 42.0
2014 431 11th lowest of 12 · 143% of median 215 5.3
2015 457 12th lowest of 12 · 152% of median 275 4.1
2016 428 10th lowest of 12 · 142% of median 366 4.8
2017 402 9th lowest of 12 · 134% of median 365 2.8
2018 62 2nd lowest of 12 · 21% of median 365 1.8
2019 323 8th lowest of 12 · 107% of median 304 3.2
2020 132 4th lowest of 12 · 44% of median 214 2.3
2021 45 1st lowest of 12 · 15% of median 29 1.5
2022 108 3rd lowest of 12 · 36% of median 214 1.6

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2729 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 69% of the irrigation seasons in 2004-2022 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.