← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CANON IRRIGATING D

Structure dossier · WDID 2200524 · 1 · CONEJOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1857-04-1532nd most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OVERFLOW D (1857-04-10). Immediately behind: TROGILLO D (1857-04-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
2662.01857-04-151883-10-22 42.6760.0 CIRRDOMAUG 22

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 3,925 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 5,775 AF — 147% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 3,690 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 56 42.8
2012 3,295 3rd lowest of 15 · 84% of median 63 42.7
2013 1,777 1st lowest of 15 · 45% of median 36 42.0
2014 3,894 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 62 42.7
2015 3,168 2nd lowest of 15 · 81% of median 58 42.9
2016 3,736 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 65 42.2
2017 6,875 15th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 114 40.0
2018 4,049 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 59 42.9
2019 5,685 12th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 90 42.0
2020 3,529 4th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 47 42.9
2021 4,239 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 59 42.7
2022 3,925 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 61 42.9
2023 5,153 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 76 42.9
2024 6,591 14th lowest of 15 · 168% of median 89 42.9
2025 5,775 13th lowest of 15 · 147% of median 95 42.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.