← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OVERFLOW D

Structure dossier · WDID 2200611 · 1 · CONEJOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1857-04-1031st most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ARCH-TROGILLIO LWR DIV 2 (1857-04-01). Immediately behind: CANON IRRIGATING D (1857-04-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
2657.01857-04-101883-10-22 11.790.0 CIRRDOM 20

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,005 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 2,624 AF — 131% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,402 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median 62 20.0
2012 769 2nd lowest of 15 · 38% of median 54 15.0
2013 728 1st lowest of 15 · 36% of median 38 12.0
2014 1,902 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 62 25.3
2015 1,680 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 54 25.3
2016 2,170 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 63 25.3
2017 2,768 13th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 69 25.0
2018 1,688 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 51 25.3
2019 2,733 12th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 76 25.0
2020 1,678 4th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 48 25.3
2021 2,005 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 64 25.3
2022 2,255 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 65 25.3
2023 3,432 15th lowest of 15 · 171% of median 87 25.3
2024 2,857 14th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 77 25.3
2025 2,624 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 83 26.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.