← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ARCH-TROGILLIO LWR DIV 2

Structure dossier · WDID 2200844 · 1 · CONEJOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1857-04-0130th most senior of the 1764 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ARCH-TROGILLIO UPR DIV 2 (1857-04-01). Immediately behind: OVERFLOW D (1857-04-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
2648.01857-04-011883-10-22 0.00.0 CIRRDOM 19

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 149 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 149 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 87 2nd lowest of 15 · 58% of median 51 1.1
2012 110 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 70 1.1
2013 81 1st lowest of 15 · 54% of median 43 1.2
2014 140 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 68 1.3
2015 101 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 58 1.1
2016 144 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 82 1.1
2017 185 11th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 80 1.9
2018 88 3rd lowest of 15 · 59% of median 36 1.9
2019 215 12th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 77 1.9
2020 149 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 46 2.2
2021 225 13th lowest of 15 · 151% of median 57 2.2
2022 158 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 46 2.2
2023 307 15th lowest of 15 · 206% of median 86 2.2
2024 233 14th lowest of 15 · 156% of median 72 2.2
2025 149 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 51 2.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2555 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 35% of the irrigation seasons in 1991-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.