← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LOBATO D 1

Structure dossier · WDID 2400564 · 1 · CULEBRA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1929-12-31205th most senior of the 453 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FARES JAQUEZ D (1901-12-31). Immediately behind: W3433 WELL NO 01 (1935-06-20).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31087.292191929-12-311951-07-23 3.00.0 CIRR 1951-4

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 107 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 30 AF — 28% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 162 11th lowest of 15 · 151% of median 112 1.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 8 0.0
2013 119 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 22 3.0
2014 48 6th lowest of 15 · 45% of median 12 3.0
2015 146 10th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 29 3.0
2016 270 14th lowest of 15 · 252% of median 52 3.0
2017 325 15th lowest of 15 · 304% of median 70 3.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 14 0.0
2019 202 12th lowest of 15 · 189% of median 73 3.0
2020 107 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 33 3.0
2021 250 13th lowest of 15 · 234% of median 70 3.0
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 18 0.0
2023 101 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 33 3.0
2024 31 5th lowest of 15 · 29% of median 20 1.5
2025 30 4th lowest of 15 · 28% of median 23 3.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.