Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOBATO D 2
Structure dossier · WDID 2400565 · 1 · CULEBRA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1898-04-30 — 203rd most senior of the 453 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: W2676 WELL NO 01 (1934-12-31). Immediately behind: FARES JAQUEZ D (1901-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31087.17652 | 1898-04-30 | 1951-07-23 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 1951-2 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 101 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 30 AF — 30% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 283 | 14th lowest of 15 · 280% of median | 109 | 3.0 |
| 2012 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 7 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | 95 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 19 | 3.0 |
| 2014 | 77 | 6th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 16 | 3.0 |
| 2015 | 213 | 11th lowest of 15 · 211% of median | 37 | 3.0 |
| 2016 | 278 | 13th lowest of 15 · 275% of median | 52 | 3.0 |
| 2017 | 374 | 15th lowest of 15 · 370% of median | 70 | 3.0 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 14 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 226 | 12th lowest of 15 · 224% of median | 69 | 3.0 |
| 2020 | 107 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 33 | 3.0 |
| 2021 | 195 | 10th lowest of 15 · 193% of median | 70 | 3.0 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 18 | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 101 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 31 | 3.0 |
| 2024 | 65 | 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 20 | 3.0 |
| 2025 | 30 | 4th lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 22 | 3.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.