← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MALONE SULLIVAN D 2

Structure dossier · WDID 2600593 · 1 · SAGUACHE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1867-04-0112th most senior of the 1548 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STAR D (1867-03-07). Immediately behind: FLORENCE D (1867-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
6300.01867-04-011889-11-23 1.560.0 CIRR 6

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 311 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 387 AF — 124% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 273 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 154 1.6
2012 414 14th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 200 1.6
2013 342 12th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 186 1.6
2014 302 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 206 1.6
2015 296 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 197 1.6
2016 258 3rd lowest of 15 · 83% of median 183 1.6
2017 328 11th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 175 1.6
2018 283 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 170 1.6
2019 83 1st lowest of 15 · 27% of median 66 1.6
2020 311 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 176 1.6
2021 311 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 188 1.6
2022 327 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 169 1.6
2023 723 15th lowest of 15 · 232% of median 208 5.2
2024 198 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 129 1.5
2025 387 13th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 190 1.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3819 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 76% of the irrigation seasons in 2002-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.