Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BORD DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3200512 · 1 · HARTMAN DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-04-20 — 150th most senior of the 638 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DURAND DITCH (1910-04-17). Immediately behind: REESE WW DITCH EXTENSION (1910-04-20).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
22024.01910-04-201962-08-14 2.00.0 CIRRDOMSTK 62-35
44559.220141910-04-101972-12-31 2.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 543 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 315 AF — 58% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 787 13th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 141 5.2
2012 799 15th lowest of 15 · 147% of median 177 4.0
2013 418 5th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 150 2.7
2014 618 10th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 155 3.2
2015 633 11th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 175 4.1
2016 787 13th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 148 3.9
2017 675 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 138 3.8
2018 399 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 112 2.6
2019 609 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 160 3.3
2020 543 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 152 2.9
2021 281 1st lowest of 15 · 52% of median 111 1.9
2022 382 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median 127 1.9
2023 457 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 140 2.4
2024 510 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 159 2.2
2025 315 2nd lowest of 15 · 58% of median 98 2.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.