Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WASTE & SEPG WATER NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 3200684 · 1 · SIMON DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-06-30 — 233rd most senior of the 638 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STEVE NO 1 DITCH (1900-12-31). Immediately behind: WASTE & SEPG WATER NO 2 (1910-06-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
41133.220951910-06-301970-12-31 1.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 47 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 37 AF — 79% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 47 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 90 0.5
2012 47 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 66 0.5
2013 15 4th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 31 0.3
2014 49 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 89 0.3
2015 49 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 82 0.6
2016 61 12th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 87 0.7
2017 113 14th lowest of 15 · 240% of median 113 1.0
2018 10 2nd lowest of 15 · 21% of median 18 0.5
2019 117 15th lowest of 15 · 249% of median 72 2.1
2020 14 3rd lowest of 15 · 30% of median 35 0.2
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2022 28 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 63 0.3
2023 74 13th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 101 0.5
2024 38 7th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 71 0.5
2025 37 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 78 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3582 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 31% of the irrigation seasons in 1971-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.