← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OWNERS WELL NO 4

Structure dossier · WDID 3605071 · 2 · SNAKE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1899-10-11179th most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OWNERS WELL NO 3 (1899-10-11). Immediately behind: SNAKE RIVER WATER DISTRICT WELL 1 (1899-10-11).

Decreed rights (5)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
18181.01899-10-111910-03-02 0.0250.0 CIRRFIRDOM 37
32075.253331919-05-121952-03-10 0.15930.0 CMUNRECDOM
48942.485631982-12-171984-12-31 0.4440.0 CIRRMUNCOMRECFIRDOM
59305.02012-05-152012-12-31 0.00.0 AIRRMUNCOMRECFIRDOM
59305.02012-05-152012-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMRECFIRDOM

Recorded use (last 7 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 73 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 142 AF — 194% of that, and 7th lowest of the 7 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2018 46 2nd lowest of 7 · 63% of median 61 0.8
2019 90 5th lowest of 7 · 123% of median 331 0.8
2020 48 3rd lowest of 7 · 66% of median 244 0.5
2021 36 1st lowest of 7 · 49% of median 37 0.8
2022 106 6th lowest of 7 · 145% of median 126 0.9
2023 73 4th lowest of 7 · 100% of median 125 0.8
2024 142 7th lowest of 7 · 194% of median 208 0.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 5 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1132 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 92% of the irrigation seasons in 2018-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.