← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

COOLEY L E NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3700552 · 1 · SPRING CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1896-05-15296th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COOLEY L E NO 1 DITCH (1896-05-15). Immediately behind: BEST DITCH (1896-05-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
22596.169371896-05-151912-02-27 1.30.0 CIRRAUG 302

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 42 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 73 AF — 174% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1995 33 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 166 0.1
1996 13 4th lowest of 15 · 31% of median 123 0.1
1997 44 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 163 0.4
1998 84 15th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 193 0.3
1999 62 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 147 0.5
2000 31 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 158 0.1
2001 42 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 214 0.1
2002 50 10th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 192 0.4
2003 65 13th lowest of 15 · 155% of median 164 0.2
2004 58 11th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 148 0.2
2005 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2007 38 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 111 0.2
2008 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2009 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 73 14th lowest of 15 · 174% of median 132 0.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.