← My Water · Print / save as PDF
FROST DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3700604 · 1 · BRUSH CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1884-06-15 — 25th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SQUIRE & HAMMOND DITCH (1884-06-01). Immediately behind: ADAMS RIB WELL AR-6 (1884-06-15).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12585.0 | 1884-06-15 | 1889-12-17 | 1.2 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 24 |
| 16251.11383 | 1881-03-01 | 1901-03-05 | 1.6 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 130 |
| 30894.26906 | 1923-09-01 | 1936-10-03 | 2.48 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 455AA |
| 54506.0 | 1999-03-26 | 1999-12-31 | 0.0 | 2.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRAUGOTHWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 609 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,165 AF — 191% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 232 | 1st lowest of 15 · 38% of median | — | 127 | 2.1 |
| 2011 | 2,596 | 15th lowest of 15 · 426% of median | — | 189 | 8.4 |
| 2012 | 381 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | — | 193 | 1.0 |
| 2013 | 766 | 11th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | — | 184 | 4.5 |
| 2014 | 609 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 184 | 2.0 |
| 2015 | 637 | 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median | — | 184 | 2.1 |
| 2016 | 372 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 372 | 214 | 0.9 |
| 2017 | 701 | 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 319 | 273 | 2.5 |
| 2018 | 464 | 5th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 319 | 304 | 5.0 |
| 2019 | 428 | 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 322 | 270 | 1.5 |
| 2020 | 496 | 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 316 | 357 | 2.0 |
| 2021 | 549 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 321 | 365 | 2.0 |
| 2022 | 875 | 12th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 321 | 365 | 3.2 |
| 2023 | 1,352 | 14th lowest of 15 · 222% of median | 321 | 365 | 4.7 |
| 2024 | 1,165 | 13th lowest of 15 · 191% of median | 321 | 305 | 4.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.