Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MILLER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3700712 · 1 · GYPSUM CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 01:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1886-08-31 — 57th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SKIFF F M DITCH (1886-07-28). Immediately behind: GYPSUM WELL T-2 (1887-03-20).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13392.0 | 1886-08-31 | 1889-12-17 | 0.9 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 44 |
| 16563.0 | 1895-05-07 | 1901-03-05 | 0.9 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 169 |
| 18036.0 | 1899-05-19 | 1901-03-05 | 0.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 190 |
| 23802.2374 | 1914-12-31 | 1915-06-07 | 4.67 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 169EX, 190 |
Legal record & documents
7 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
CA0294, CA0385, CA0374.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA0294 | 4 | 1915-06-07 | O, S |
CA0385 | 2 | 1901-03-05 | S |
CA0374 | 1 | 1889-12-17 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 629 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 748 AF — 119% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1,061 | 13th lowest of 15 · 169% of median | 184 | 6.0 |
| 2011 | 1,656 | 15th lowest of 15 · 263% of median | 180 | 5.1 |
| 2012 | 647 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 192 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 643 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 189 | 5.0 |
| 2014 | 1,180 | 14th lowest of 15 · 188% of median | 204 | 5.0 |
| 2015 | 629 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 227 | 5.0 |
| 2016 | 597 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 192 | 2.8 |
| 2017 | 592 | 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 177 | 2.8 |
| 2018 | 397 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 133 | 2.8 |
| 2019 | 590 | 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 142 | 2.2 |
| 2020 | 343 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 177 | 2.2 |
| 2021 | 274 | 1st lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 146 | 2.2 |
| 2022 | 453 | 4th lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 164 | 3.2 |
| 2023 | 933 | 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 152 | 3.8 |
| 2024 | 748 | 11th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 163 | 2.7 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-38 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.018).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 4 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 9149 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 58% of the irrigation seasons in 1951-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.