← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

STRATTON AND CO DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3700823 · 1 · GYPSUM CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:31 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1881-07-013rd most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORGAARD DITCH (1881-07-01). Immediately behind: EYE LAKE SUPPLY DITCH (1881-07-01).

Decreed rights (14)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
11505.01881-07-011889-12-17 9.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOMAUG 1
11969.01882-10-081889-12-17 2.650.0 CIRR 7
12539.01884-04-301889-12-17 1.00.0 CIRRAUG 19
12875.01885-04-011889-12-17 0.40.0 CIRR 30
13338.01886-07-081889-12-17 0.650.0 CIRRAUG 41
13345.01886-07-151889-12-17 1.10.0 CIRR 42
13392.01886-08-311889-12-17 0.00.0 CIRR 44
14458.01889-08-011889-12-17 1.70.0 CIRR 84
18036.01899-05-191901-03-05 0.00.0 CIRR 190
20427.184181900-06-051907-06-04 3.550.0 CIRR 223
20427.184191900-06-061907-06-04 1.70.0 CIRR 224
20427.191811902-07-081907-06-04 2.00.0 CIRR 241
23802.23741914-12-311915-06-07 25.650.0 CIRR 190EX, 19E
55517.540561997-12-312002-12-31 5.00.0 CIRRCOMRECFISFIRAUGOTHWLD

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 5,655 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 7,157 AF — 127% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 8,267 15th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 175 35.7
2011 7,328 12th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 155 33.1
2012 4,120 3rd lowest of 15 · 73% of median 186 12.8
2013 5,055 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 178 34.1
2014 7,227 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 204 31.0
2015 7,841 13th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 577 231 31.3
2016 7,255 11th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 576 202 40.7
2017 3,962 2nd lowest of 15 · 70% of median 576 188 13.5
2018 3,901 1st lowest of 15 · 69% of median 576 184 17.9
2019 4,802 5th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 576 206 20.3
2020 4,812 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 576 184 31.9
2021 4,605 4th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 576 187 20.2
2022 5,655 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 576 184 28.3
2023 8,081 14th lowest of 15 · 143% of median 1,284 177 25.3
2024 7,157 9th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 1,409 194 27.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.