← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HERRICK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3800749 · 1 · MAROON CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:04 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-10-01 — 630th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MORTON WELL (1935-01-31). Immediately behind: MAROON CREEK DITCH NO 1 (1910-06-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31648.14884 | 1890-10-01 | 1940-02-05 | 9.3 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 440.5 |
| 37552.37102 | 1951-08-01 | 1958-06-20 | 51.56 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 683 |
| 51125.0 | 1989-12-22 | 1989-12-31 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRCOMRECFISDOMWLD | |
| 57920.0 | 2008-07-30 | 2008-12-31 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISOTHWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,631 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,942 AF — 112% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1,143 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 43% of median | — | 100 | 16.9 |
| 2010 | 1,196 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 46% of median | — | 117 | 16.9 |
| 2011 | 2,869 | 10th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | — | 113 | 23.6 |
| 2012 | 2,174 | 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | — | 98 | 11.3 |
| 2013 | 478 | 1st lowest of 15 · 18% of median | — | 35 | 7.1 |
| 2014 | 2,229 | 7th lowest of 15 · 85% of median | — | 126 | 16.5 |
| 2016 | 3,904 | 14th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | — | 114 | 18.4 |
| 2017 | 2,837 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | — | 97 | 14.9 |
| 2018 | 2,631 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 139 | 17.0 |
| 2019 | 2,041 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | — | 107 | 16.8 |
| 2020 | 1,981 | 4th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 257 | 214 | 10.7 |
| 2021 | 3,347 | 12th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 553 | 214 | 18.1 |
| 2022 | 4,984 | 15th lowest of 15 · 189% of median | — | 135 | 18.8 |
| 2023 | 3,413 | 13th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | — | 146 | 16.1 |
| 2024 | 2,942 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 146 | 16.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.