← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WALKERS GULCH SPG DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3801077 · 4 · CRYSTAL RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:33 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1928-04-01 — 739th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUFFALO DITCH NO 1 (1925-12-31). Immediately behind: NORTH SPGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 (1929-09-21).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36396.2858 | 1928-04-01 | 1952-10-24 | 3.97 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 538 |
| 36639.0 | 1950-04-25 | 1952-10-24 | 7.99 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 596 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 655 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 1,784 AF — 272% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 655 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 170 | 6.0 |
| 1981 | 82 | 1st lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 47 | 0.9 |
| 1982 | 243 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 37% of median | 137 | 0.9 |
| 1983 | 327 | 6th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 165 | 1.0 |
| 1984 | 337 | 7th lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 170 | 1.0 |
| 1985 | 276 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 140 | 1.0 |
| 1994 | 302 | 4th lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 61 | 2.5 |
| 1995 | 1,799 | 14th lowest of 15 · 275% of median | 365 | 3.0 |
| 1996 | 1,679 | 12th lowest of 15 · 256% of median | 335 | 4.0 |
| 1997 | 1,448 | 11th lowest of 15 · 221% of median | 365 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 1,266 | 10th lowest of 15 · 193% of median | 365 | 2.0 |
| 1999 | 801 | 9th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 293 | 2.0 |
| 2002 | 302 | 4th lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 61 | 2.5 |
| 2003 | 3,093 | 15th lowest of 15 · 472% of median | 304 | 8.0 |
| 2006 | 1,784 | 13th lowest of 15 · 272% of median | 178 | 8.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.