← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BUFFALO DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 3801791 · 1 · BUFFALO CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:41 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1925-12-31738th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUFFALO DITCH NO 7 (1925-12-31). Immediately behind: WALKERS GULCH SPG DITCH (1928-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
36396.277581925-12-311952-10-24 2.50.0 CIRRRECFISFIRSTKAUGOTH 536

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 107 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 6 AF — 6% of that, and 1st lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 134 7th lowest of 11 · 125% of median 46 1.5
2006 107 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 37 1.5
2007 214 9th lowest of 11 · 200% of median 73 1.5
2008 201 8th lowest of 11 · 188% of median 47 2.2
2009 237 10th lowest of 11 · 222% of median 75 1.8
2010 237 10th lowest of 11 · 222% of median 67 1.8
2011 57 3rd lowest of 11 · 53% of median 20 1.5
2013 71 5th lowest of 11 · 66% of median 37 1.0
2014 60 4th lowest of 11 · 56% of median 16 2.0
2015 28 2nd lowest of 11 · 26% of median 8 2.0
2017 6 1st lowest of 11 · 6% of median 7 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 433 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 17% of the irrigation seasons in 2005-2017 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.