← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MAROON CR PL & DIVR DAM

Structure dossier · WDID 3801156 · 7 · MAROON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1965-12-292645th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FOLEY DITCH (1948-06-01). Immediately behind: HARDY HILLS WELL (1966-07-25).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47481.423661965-12-291980-12-31 0.068.4 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKPWR
52452.01993-08-101993-12-31 0.04.5 CIRRMUNINDRECFISFIRDOMSNOOTH

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 16,860 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2011, came in at 18,284 AF — 108% of that, and 5th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 2,715 3rd lowest of 8 · 16% of median 61 26.0
2000 15,435 4th lowest of 8 · 92% of median 305 44.0
2004 1,429 1st lowest of 8 · 8% of median 61 13.7
2005 22,554 6th lowest of 8 · 134% of median 365 49.8
2006 24,242 8th lowest of 8 · 144% of median 365 51.0
2007 23,705 7th lowest of 8 · 141% of median 304 68.4
2010 2,550 2nd lowest of 8 · 15% of median 61 26.7
2011 18,284 5th lowest of 8 · 108% of median 304 68.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1826 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 71% of the irrigation seasons in 1999-2011 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.