Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
PINES GROVE PIPELINE
Structure dossier · WDID 3801332 · 7 · ROARING FORK RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-10-03 — 69th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BRUSH CREEK DITCH (1882-10-03). Immediately behind: PASTURES PIPELINE (1882-10-03).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11964.0 | 1882-10-03 | 1889-05-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISSTKOTH | 48 |
| 12924.0 | 1885-05-20 | 1889-05-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISSTKOTH | 122 |
| 19832.14421 | 1889-06-25 | 1904-05-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 207B |
| 30941.17592 | 1898-03-01 | 1936-08-25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 324 |
| 52595.52536 | 1993-11-02 | 1994-12-31 | 0.728 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISSTKOTH | |
| 55882.55558 | 2002-02-10 | 2003-12-31 | 0.155 | 0.135 | C | IRRRECFISWLD |
Legal record & documents
11 decreed actions on record across
7 court cases:
21CW3076, 03CW0138, 94CW0380, 02CW0028, 03CW0136, 94CW0381, 07CW0052.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
21CW3076 | 1 | 2003-12-31 | S |
03CW0138 | 1 | 2003-12-31 | S |
94CW0380 | 1 | 1994-12-31 | S |
02CW0028 | 1 | 1994-12-31 | S |
03CW0136 | 4 | 1936-08-25 | O, S |
94CW0381 | 2 | 1889-05-11 | O |
07CW0052 | 1 | 1889-05-11 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 6 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | absent | no diversion records cached |
| record continuity | unknown | no record span to measure against |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.