← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FRY ARK PR MID CUNHAM CR

Structure dossier · WDID 3801600 · 0 · MIDDLE CUNNINGHAM CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1957-07-291039th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRY ARK PR LIME CREEK (1957-07-29). Immediately behind: FRY ARK PR MIDWAY CREEK (1957-07-29).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
39291.01957-07-291958-06-20 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMIND 718

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,178 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,354 AF — 108% of that, and 8th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2013 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2014 2,573 11th lowest of 12 · 118% of median 365 39.7
2015 2,379 10th lowest of 12 · 109% of median 304 42.9
2016 2,118 6th lowest of 12 · 97% of median 92 41.0
2017 2,239 7th lowest of 12 · 103% of median 183 41.0
2018 1,406 3rd lowest of 12 · 64% of median 304 25.9
2019 3,040 12th lowest of 12 · 140% of median 274 39.8
2020 1,710 4th lowest of 12 · 78% of median 366 39.2
2021 1,364 2nd lowest of 12 · 63% of median 365 35.0
2022 2,113 5th lowest of 12 · 97% of median 365 42.2
2023 2,368 9th lowest of 12 · 109% of median 365 34.0
2024 2,354 8th lowest of 12 · 108% of median 305 39.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3349 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2013-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.