← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FRY ARK PR MIDWAY CREEK

Structure dossier · WDID 3801601 · 0 · MIDWAY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1957-07-291040th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRY ARK PR MID CUNHAM CR (1957-07-29). Immediately behind: FRY ARK PR MORMON CREEK (1957-07-29).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
39291.01957-07-291958-06-20 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMIND 718

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,240 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,458 AF — 58% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2013 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2014 6,612 11th lowest of 12 · 156% of median 365 82.0
2015 5,595 10th lowest of 12 · 132% of median 304 84.8
2016 5,240 9th lowest of 12 · 124% of median 92 85.0
2017 4,983 8th lowest of 12 · 118% of median 153 85.0
2018 3,749 5th lowest of 12 · 88% of median 304 68.0
2019 7,113 12th lowest of 12 · 168% of median 214 83.8
2020 4,001 6th lowest of 12 · 94% of median 366 74.3
2021 3,450 3rd lowest of 12 · 81% of median 365 80.4
2022 3,719 4th lowest of 12 · 88% of median 365 74.1
2023 4,478 7th lowest of 12 · 106% of median 365 69.3
2024 2,458 2nd lowest of 12 · 58% of median 305 75.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3259 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2013-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.