← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FRY ARK PR NORTH FORK DV

Structure dossier · WDID 3801609 · 0 · NORTH FORK FRYINGPAN RIV · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1957-07-291048th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRY ARK PR NO NAME CREEK (1957-07-29). Immediately behind: FRY ARK PR S F FRYPAN R (1957-07-29).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
39291.01957-07-291958-06-20 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMIND 718

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,234 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,234 AF — 100% of that, and 6th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2013 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2014 1,356 10th lowest of 12 · 110% of median 365 21.0
2015 1,403 11th lowest of 12 · 114% of median 304 21.1
2016 1,234 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 122 21.0
2017 1,283 8th lowest of 12 · 104% of median 275 20.0
2018 1,294 9th lowest of 12 · 105% of median 304 264.2
2019 1,955 12th lowest of 12 · 158% of median 214 24.5
2020 948 4th lowest of 12 · 77% of median 366 18.5
2021 585 2nd lowest of 12 · 47% of median 365 16.2
2022 854 3rd lowest of 12 · 69% of median 365 17.1
2023 1,126 5th lowest of 12 · 91% of median 365 16.7
2024 1,234 6th lowest of 12 · 100% of median 305 22.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3411 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2013-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.