← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

YOUNGS CREEK FEEDER D

Structure dossier · WDID 4000670 · 1 · YOUNGS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:44 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1913-05-071436th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ROOSEVELT DITCH (1912-05-01). Immediately behind: STELL BUTTES ENLG DITCH (1913-12-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
25807.231371913-05-071930-02-10 34.00.0 CIRR G78

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 132 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2004 no recorded volume 213 0
2005 no recorded volume 752 0
2006 no recorded volume 280 0
2007 no recorded volume 250 0
2008 no recorded volume 552 0
2009 no recorded volume 364 0
2010 no recorded volume 114 0
2011 292 7th lowest of 8 · 220% of median 45 6.0
2012 56 4th lowest of 8 · 42% of median 18 2.0
2013 45 3rd lowest of 8 · 34% of median 26 1.0
2014 209 5th lowest of 8 · 158% of median 61 4.5
2015 313 8th lowest of 8 · 236% of median 47 5.0
2016 212 6th lowest of 8 · 160% of median 41 3.2
2018 0 1st lowest of 8 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 8 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.