← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CAMPBELL DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4000866 · 1 · ESCALANTE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:42 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1892-01-01652nd most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HARRY WALKER DITCH (1890-03-01). Immediately behind: HADLER DITCH (1892-05-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19773.153411892-01-011906-02-17 1.420.0 CIRR 9
29260.205021906-02-181937-05-28 2.50.0 CIRR H57

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 301 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 309 AF — 103% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 264 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 53 4.0
2011 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2012 832 15th lowest of 15 · 276% of median 195 3.0
2013 301 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 119 2.5
2014 421 14th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 143 2.5
2015 343 10th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 107 2.5
2016 399 11th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 162 1.9
2017 264 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 128 1.5
2018 71 2nd lowest of 15 · 24% of median 100 0.8
2019 230 3rd lowest of 15 · 76% of median 124 1.2
2020 401 12th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 171 2.5
2021 272 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 152 1.5
2022 409 13th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 163 2.0
2023 273 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 133 1.2
2024 309 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 107 1.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 7381 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 63% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.