← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BRANDON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4200509 · 1 · WHITEWATER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-06-3019th most senior of the 726 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BORTLES PUMP (1885-08-11). Immediately behind: ANDERSON DITCH (1887-07-25).

Decreed rights (16)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
14086.122341883-06-301890-02-07 0.530.0 CIRR
14086.122541883-07-201890-02-07 1.60.0 CIRR
14086.12641884-08-091890-02-07 3.550.0 CIRR
14086.135191887-01-051890-02-07 0.360.0 CIRR
14086.135251887-01-111890-02-07 0.720.0 CIRR
14086.138051887-10-181890-02-07 0.360.0 CIRR
22283.174411897-10-011912-07-22 0.00.0 CIRR
22848.211081907-10-171916-06-01 0.00.0 CIRR
34419.231621913-06-011959-07-21 2.340.0 CIRR
35641.01947-08-011959-07-21 5.00.0 CIRR
36645.01950-05-011959-07-21 2.50.0 CIRR
40013.182631900-01-011972-04-13 3.80.0 CIRR
40013.329771940-04-151972-04-13 24.80.0 CIRR
49308.122541883-07-201985-12-31 1.00.0 CSTK
49308.167241895-10-151985-12-31 1.00.0 CSTK
49465.01985-06-061985-12-31 7.637.37 CSTOIRRMUNINDAUGPWR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,034 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,498 AF — 123% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 2,065 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 287 26.3
2011 2,696 11th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 214 27.5
2012 1,393 5th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 206 8.6
2013 1,413 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 214 18.4
2014 2,034 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 213 22.0
2015 3,185 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 275 19.8
2016 4,112 15th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 366 30.2
2017 3,474 14th lowest of 15 · 171% of median 304 12.6
2018 1,392 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 273 6.2
2019 3,303 13th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 365 31.6
2020 1,892 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 317 8.6
2021 885 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 101 365 2.6
2022 613 1st lowest of 15 · 30% of median 63 365 1.3
2023 1,349 3rd lowest of 15 · 66% of median 133 365 10.0
2024 2,498 10th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 83 305 13.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 16 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 11881 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1979-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.