← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BUNN DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 4500534 · 1 · CLEAR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1906-06-22159th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CHURCHFIELD WASTEWATER D (1893-09-25). Immediately behind: BUNN DITCH NO 2 (1906-06-22).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21876.206261906-06-221909-12-20 0.60.0 CIRRDOM 139

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 99 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2009, came in at 234 AF — 236% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 26 3rd lowest of 15 · 26% of median 24 0.6
1995 296 13th lowest of 15 · 299% of median 51 3.4
1996 17 2nd lowest of 15 · 17% of median 15 0.6
1997 55 5th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 24 1.2
1998 337 14th lowest of 15 · 340% of median 55 4.0
1999 89 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 31 1.5
2000 140 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 49 1.5
2001 99 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 42 1.2
2003 28 4th lowest of 15 · 28% of median 8 2.0
2004 12 1st lowest of 15 · 12% of median 4 2.0
2005 449 15th lowest of 15 · 454% of median 84 4.0
2006 104 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 23 3.0
2007 66 6th lowest of 15 · 67% of median 30 1.5
2008 179 11th lowest of 15 · 181% of median 51 2.0
2009 234 12th lowest of 15 · 236% of median 53 2.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.