Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BUNN DITCH NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 4500843 · 1 · CLEAR CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1906-06-22 — 160th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUNN DITCH NO 1 (1906-06-22). Immediately behind: EGBERT SPRING DITCH NO 1 (1893-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21876.20626 | 1906-06-22 | 1909-12-20 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 139 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 24 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2005, came in at 119 AF — 496% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1991 | 120 | 12th lowest of 15 · 500% of median | 59 | 2.1 |
| 1992 | 56 | 10th lowest of 15 · 233% of median | 39 | 1.0 |
| 1993 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1994 | 18 | 6th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 17 | 0.6 |
| 1995 | 551 | 14th lowest of 15 · 2296% of median | 42 | 11.2 |
| 1996 | 714 | 15th lowest of 15 · 2975% of median | 7 | 60.0 |
| 1997 | 7 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 29% of median | 23 | 0.2 |
| 1998 | 333 | 13th lowest of 15 · 1388% of median | 48 | 4.0 |
| 1999 | 21 | 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 8 | 1.5 |
| 2000 | 27 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 11 | 1.5 |
| 2001 | 24 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 9 | 1.5 |
| 2003 | 13 | 4th lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 8 | 0.9 |
| 2004 | 13 | 4th lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 4 | 2.2 |
| 2005 | 119 | 11th lowest of 15 · 496% of median | 61 | 1.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.