Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SCHATZ DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4500755 · 1 · DRY HOLLOW CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1953-05-15 — 348th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WAYNE DITCH (1953-04-02). Immediately behind: RINEHART NO 8 SPG AND PL (1953-10-11).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37755.0 | 1953-05-15 | 1965-07-09 | 2.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 247 |
| 40481.0 | 1960-10-31 | 1965-07-09 | 2.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 270 |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
W0584, W0110, CA4954.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W0584 | 1 | 1965-07-09 | S |
W0110 | 1 | 1965-07-09 | S |
CA4954 | 2 | 1965-07-09 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 45 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 35 AF — 78% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 238 | 15th lowest of 15 · 529% of median | 31 | 4.0 |
| 1978 | 230 | 14th lowest of 15 · 511% of median | 36 | 4.0 |
| 1979 | 119 | 11th lowest of 15 · 264% of median | 18 | 4.0 |
| 1980 | 46 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 6 | 4.6 |
| 1981 | 57 | 10th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 11 | 2.9 |
| 1982 | 198 | 13th lowest of 15 · 440% of median | 53 | 2.9 |
| 1983 | 45 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 9 | 2.8 |
| 1987 | 129 | 12th lowest of 15 · 287% of median | 14 | 5.0 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1991 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1995 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1996 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1997 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2001 | 3 | 6th lowest of 15 · 7% of median | 3 | 0.8 |
| 2023 | 35 | 7th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 8 | 2.5 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-5 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.005).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 251 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 2% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2023 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.