← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WAYNE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4500813 · 1 · BATTLEMENT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1953-04-02347th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KNIGHT SPRING & PIPELINE (1950-07-24). Immediately behind: SCHATZ DITCH (1953-05-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
37712.01953-04-021965-07-09 3.00.0 CIRR 213

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 241 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2011, came in at 290 AF — 120% of that, and 8th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1989 1,166 10th lowest of 10 · 484% of median 196 3.0
1993 1,047 9th lowest of 10 · 434% of median 177 3.0
1995 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1999 256 6th lowest of 10 · 106% of median 130 1.0
2000 226 5th lowest of 10 · 94% of median 115 1.0
2001 274 7th lowest of 10 · 114% of median 139 1.0
2002 194 4th lowest of 10 · 80% of median 197 0.5
2009 87 3rd lowest of 10 · 36% of median 25 2.0
2010 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2011 290 8th lowest of 10 · 120% of median 33 5.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.