← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BIG GRIZZLY DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4700512 · 1 · GRIZZLY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1883-07-01 — 20th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GOVERNMENT DITCH NO 1 (1883-06-30). Immediately behind: CHEDSEY DITCH 1 (1883-07-01).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12235.0 | 1883-07-01 | 1892-09-19 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 7 |
| 13269.0 | 1886-04-30 | 1892-09-19 | 10.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 25 |
| 15919.0 | 1893-08-01 | 1902-04-23 | 20.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 140(126) |
| 43829.39902 | 1959-04-01 | 1970-12-31 | 20.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK | |
| 56613.55999 | 2003-04-27 | 2005-12-31 | 16.65 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 3,643 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 2,211 AF — 61% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 4,325 | 10th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 52 | 64.1 |
| 2009 | 3,679 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 62 | 50.0 |
| 2010 | 5,960 | 12th lowest of 15 · 164% of median | 82 | 65.0 |
| 2012 | 3,213 | 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 139 | 20.0 |
| 2013 | 2,845 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 63 | 42.2 |
| 2014 | 3,643 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 47 | 42.2 |
| 2015 | 5,205 | 11th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 65 | 47.8 |
| 2016 | 7,240 | 14th lowest of 15 · 199% of median | 61 | 68.9 |
| 2017 | 575 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 60 | 5.0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 6,404 | 13th lowest of 15 · 176% of median | 61 | 60.1 |
| 2022 | 2,851 | 6th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 18 | 96.7 |
| 2023 | 9,102 | 15th lowest of 15 · 250% of median | 60 | 94.5 |
| 2024 | 1,690 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 16 | 56.8 |
| 2025 | 2,211 | 4th lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 92 | 12.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.