← My Water · Print / save as PDF
COL DAVIS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4700567 · 1 · MICHIGAN RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-05-25 — 158th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SLEW DITCH (1888-05-24). Immediately behind: HOWARD DITCH (1888-05-25).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14025.0 | 1888-05-25 | 1892-09-19 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 127(117) |
| 14143.0 | 1888-09-20 | 1892-09-19 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 158(144) |
| 50403.32659 | 1939-06-02 | 1988-12-31 | 12.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 50403.32707 | 1939-07-20 | 1988-12-31 | 3.2 | 0.0 | C | STK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,814 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 919 AF — 51% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2,359 | 13th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 53 | 27.5 |
| 2009 | 1,814 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 59 | 31.6 |
| 2010 | 3,231 | 14th lowest of 15 · 178% of median | 53 | 41.5 |
| 2012 | 1,155 | 6th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 76 | 28.4 |
| 2013 | 1,396 | 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 56 | 30.7 |
| 2014 | 2,094 | 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 31 | 47.8 |
| 2015 | 3,651 | 15th lowest of 15 · 201% of median | 75 | 33.6 |
| 2016 | 2,129 | 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 57 | 37.0 |
| 2017 | 2,210 | 12th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 70 | 27.2 |
| 2018 | 266 | 1st lowest of 15 · 15% of median | 15 | 11.3 |
| 2020 | 826 | 4th lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 44 | 10.4 |
| 2021 | 680 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 46 | 10.0 |
| 2022 | 497 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 30 | 19.4 |
| 2023 | 2,158 | 11th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 62 | 47.8 |
| 2025 | 919 | 5th lowest of 15 · 51% of median | 64 | 11.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.