← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DURGIN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4700599 · 1 · PINKHAM CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-05-01274th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OKLAHOMA DITCH NO 2 (1894-10-18). Immediately behind: ALBERT CLAUSON DITCH (1895-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16557.01895-05-011901-05-17 6.50.0 CIRR 277(265)

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 443 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 8 AF — 2% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 134 4th lowest of 15 · 30% of median 60 1.5
2009 611 9th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 97 6.0
2010 1,087 12th lowest of 15 · 245% of median 96 8.0
2012 129 3rd lowest of 15 · 29% of median 40 2.5
2013 210 5th lowest of 15 · 47% of median 74 3.5
2015 349 7th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 91 4.5
2016 725 11th lowest of 15 · 164% of median 67 6.3
2017 701 10th lowest of 15 · 158% of median 118 4.6
2018 59 2nd lowest of 15 · 13% of median 51 1.5
2019 1,379 14th lowest of 15 · 311% of median 72 13.5
2020 255 6th lowest of 15 · 58% of median 31 5.4
2021 443 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 67 4.1
2022 1,129 13th lowest of 15 · 255% of median 74 12.0
2023 2,090 15th lowest of 15 · 472% of median 99 22.6
2024 8 1st lowest of 15 · 2% of median 4 1.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.