← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LIEUALLEN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4700724 · 1 · JACK CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1898-06-01431st most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MILL CREEK DITCH (1896-06-01). Immediately behind: WESTFIELD DITCH (1898-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21366.176841898-06-011913-01-06 4.00.0 CIRR 338

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 68 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 22 AF — 32% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2003 450 11th lowest of 15 · 662% of median 49 6.0
2005 226 10th lowest of 15 · 332% of median 24 6.0
2008 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2010 171 9th lowest of 15 · 252% of median 37 4.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2014 510 12th lowest of 15 · 750% of median 86 8.0
2015 65 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 35 1.0
2016 68 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 15 2.7
2018 13 4th lowest of 15 · 19% of median 3 6.5
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 29 6th lowest of 15 · 43% of median 11 2.9
2022 781 14th lowest of 15 · 1148% of median 63 9.4
2023 1,585 15th lowest of 15 · 2331% of median 112 9.4
2024 593 13th lowest of 15 · 872% of median 44 7.8
2025 22 5th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 7 3.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1524 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 13% of the irrigation seasons in 1972-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.