← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

REITHMEYER D

Structure dossier · WDID 4700852 · 1 · NORTH FORK NORTH PLATTE · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1889-06-20213th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORRIS DITCH (1889-06-10). Immediately behind: LAKE JOHN CMPGRD GALLERY (1889-06-20).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
14416.01889-06-201892-09-19 3.340.0 CIRRCOMDOM 99(89)

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 185 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 258 AF — 140% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 170 6th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 68 2.0
2008 112 5th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 38 2.5
2009 185 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 54 2.6
2010 252 11th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 55 3.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2013 171 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 45 2.0
2014 402 14th lowest of 15 · 217% of median 58 3.6
2015 345 13th lowest of 15 · 186% of median 65 3.2
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2017 238 10th lowest of 15 · 129% of median 81 1.5
2018 190 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 65 1.5
2019 584 15th lowest of 15 · 316% of median 61 4.9
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2025 258 12th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 42 3.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.