← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SIX MILE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4700877 · 1 · SIXMILE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1911-11-30474th most senior of the 1262 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: THIRTY SIX DITCH (1911-07-09). Immediately behind: DORAN DITCH (1912-06-12).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
23016.226131911-11-301923-03-06 3.00.0 CIRR 384

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 364 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 99 3rd lowest of 15 · 27% of median 82 1.0
2007 358 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 77 3.5
2008 485 13th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 102 4.0
2009 364 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 72 4.0
2010 388 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 75 6.0
2012 88 2nd lowest of 15 · 24% of median 55 1.0
2013 207 5th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 61 2.8
2014 264 6th lowest of 15 · 72% of median 84 2.5
2015 434 11th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 75 4.5
2016 427 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 59 3.8
2017 508 14th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 89 5.8
2018 436 12th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 79 3.2
2019 935 15th lowest of 15 · 257% of median 88 6.9
2020 106 4th lowest of 15 · 29% of median 42 1.4
2025 1 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2524 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 23% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.